Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Omniscience | barczek | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard Last Chance #12761383 |
| Azorius Control | ivc | 5-0 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Last Chance #12761383 |
| Azorius Control | soto_ | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Domain Zur Overlords | squee_goblin_nabob | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
| Unknown Archetype | geokh1 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
4 Color Beanstalk , 5 Color Battles , 5 Color Caves , Abzan Beanstalk , Abzan Doubling , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Reanimator , Azorius Aggro , Azorius Angels
Meta Performance Analysis
Get Lost ranks #139 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 41%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 58.8%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Get Lost is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 16.66 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.7%. Get Lost has a win rate of 70.1%, making it 0.5% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 13 | 84.7% | 8 |
| Geological Appraiser | Creature — Human Artificer | 5 | 81.4% | 3 |
| Jeskai Revelation | Instant | 10 | 78.8% | 4 |
| Shiko, Paragon of the Way | Legendary Creature — Spirit Dragon | 19 | 78.2% | 9 |
| Rediscover the Way | Enchantment — Saga | 8 | 76.6% | 3 |
| Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 19 | 76.4% | 8 |
| Essence Scatter | Instant | 14 | 70.2% | 5 |
| Anointed Peacekeeper | Creature — Human Cleric | 8 | 69.6% | 4 |
| Karn, Living Legacy | Legendary Planeswalker — Karn | 11 | 64.7% | 2 |
| Chimil, the Inner Sun | Legendary Artifact | 13 | 62.1% | 3 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Get Lost than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liliana of the Veil | Legendary Planeswalker — Liliana | 3 | 6 | 86.8% | 72.3% | +14.6% |
| Roiling Dragonstorm | Enchantment | 2 | 5 | 85.3% | 71.2% | +14.1% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 10 | 82.5% | 72.0% | +10.6% |
| Dispelling Exhale | Instant | 2 | 13 | 81.8% | 73.7% | +8.2% |
| Defabricate | Instant | 2 | 9 | 84.6% | 77.3% | +7.3% |
| Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 1 | 7 | 77.5% | 70.5% | +7.0% |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 7 | 76.2% | 69.2% | +7.0% |
| Abrade | Instant | 2 | 11 | 82.5% | 75.7% | +6.8% |
| Exorcise | Sorcery | 2 | 22 | 79.6% | 74.2% | +5.4% |
| Riptide Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 5 | 22 | 77.8% | 72.5% | +5.3% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domain Zur Overlords | 1268 | 97.3% | 49.1% |
| Mono White Tokens | 604 | 99.7% | 43.8% |
| Azorius Control | 364 | 99.5% | 50.8% |
| Azorius Omniscience | 265 | 80.3% | 50.5% |
| Azorius Tempo | 161 | 40.5% | 34.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.